logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.04.08 2019나69148
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the records or images of evidence No. 16 through No. 31 submitted by the plaintiff are presented at the court of first instance, the fact-finding and the judgment of the court of

Therefore, the reasons for the entry in this case are as follows: (a) each of the “instant franchise store agreement” in the second and third Forms 7 and 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be “instant franchise agreement”; (b) “franchise fee” in the second and third Forms 13 shall be “franchise fee”; and (c) “Plaintiff” in the third and fourth Forms 11 and 4 shall be as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where “Defendant” is respectively, and therefore, they shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion must be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow