logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.07.02 2020구단100958
보상금증액 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 62,744,00 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from March 12, 2019 to December 23, 2019.

Reasons

1. Details of ruling;

A. Plaintiff’s business 1) The Plaintiff is a corporation established for the purpose of housing construction business, etc. on February 28, 201 (mutually, C Co., Ltd. at the time of its establishment). (2) On March 10, 2011, the Plaintiff leased the second floor (hereinafter “instant building”) of the Seo-gu Daejeon District Office D ground, Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “instant building”) and operated the instant building construction business, etc. from around that time.

3) On March 8, 2011, the Plaintiff shall be the location of the instant building, and the type of the business was registered as a construction business, etc.

C. On January 25, 2019, the Daejeon Metropolitan City Land Tribunal’s adjudication of expropriation by the Daejeon Metropolitan City Land Tribunal (Seoul Metropolitan City Land Tribunal) rendered an adjudication to recognize KRW 6,100,000 of the compensation for relocation of goods (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) as compensation for damages to the Plaintiff, who is a lessee of the instant building included in the instant project district (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”).

The starting date of acceptance decided in this case's expropriation ruling is March 11, 2019.

Adjudication of the Central Land Tribunal on September 26, 2019 - Plaintiff’s compensation for losses (including transfer expenses): 6,100,000 won (no amount increased; dismissal of an objection); - Compensation for suspension of work related to suspension of work without any particular reason shall be dismissed without any particular reason.

E. As a result of the appraisal of business suspension compensation in the relevant case, in the instant case No. 2018da226968, the Plaintiff had appraised as of the date of the instant adjudication on expropriation regarding the compensation for business suspension of the Plaintiff company in the instant building, which is a civil case, based on the date of the instant adjudication on expropriation. The amount of compensation for business suspension (excluding relocation expenses of business facilities, etc.) caused by the instant project of the Plaintiff company was assessed as KRW 62,7

(hereinafter referred to as “the result of the court’s appraisal of the relevant case”). [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute, and Article 1.1.

arrow