logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.23 2018고단3427
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Except as otherwise provided for in other Acts, no person shall borrow or lend any access medium with the intention of receiving, demanding or promising any compensation.

Nevertheless, on January 30, 2018, the Defendant needs to keep a borrowed account in front of the residence of the apartment B apartment, C, and the Defendant’s dwelling route of the Defendant.

It is intended to use the account and check card for two weeks, and provide three million won in return.

“A” in receipt of a proposal from a person who was unable to use his name, sent one physical card connected to the D Bank account E in the name of the Defendant via Kwikset Service Articles to the above name in the name of the Defendant, notify the account number and the password in the F Meger’s name, and send the card again after receiving the re-issuance of the F Meger’s name from the above person in the name of the above on February 1, 2018.

different types.

“The contact was received and re-issued the e-mail card connected to the said account on the same day, and then sent the e-mail card through Kwikset Service Articles at the front of the residence of the above defendant.

As a result, the Defendant promised to pay for the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Documents and written statements of G;

1. A report on investigation (a copy of a certificate of deposit transaction);

1. A detailed statement of transactions of automated machines, copy of a certificate of deposit transaction records, and a written provision of financial transaction information;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the contents of the F dialogue;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions and the Selection of a fine for a crime, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on the Electronic Financial Transactions and the Selection of a fine for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. To lend money in return for promising the payment of consideration to the electronic financial transaction access medium on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow