The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant did not intend to acquire the price of the goods from the beginning as well as to pay the price of the goods due to temporary financial background in a long-term continuous transaction relationship with the victims.

2. The judgment of the court below also asserted as the grounds for appeal, and on this basis, the court below explained the following circumstances in detail under the title "the judgment on the criminal intent to defraud the defendant," and determined that the defendant's act of selling alcoholic beverages by selling alcoholic beverages based on this reasoning was sufficiently recognized that the defendant had the criminal intent to obtain alcoholic beverages from the victims and pay them normally even if he did not have the intent or ability to pay them normally within the payment date even if he received alcoholic beverages from the victims and delivered them as the payment for the bill, and thus, the defendant did not receive alcoholic beverages from the victims and did not pay them.

In light of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below as well as the circumstances revealed by the court below, the above judgment of the court below is just, and there is an error of law of misunderstanding of facts as alleged by the defendant.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

① 피고인 스스로 수사기관에서 E로부터 물품을 공급 받고 약속어음으로 결제하더라도 지급 기일에 어음금액 상당을 지급할 능력이 되지 않았음을 인정하였다( 원심 2014 고합 694 사건의 증거기록 61∽62 면). ② 피고인이 2003년 경 ∽2004 년 경부터 이 사건 거래 이전까지 피해자들과 장기간 거래하는 동안 주류대금을 연체하는 등의 문제를 발생시키지 않은 것으로 보이기는 하나, 이 사건 공소사실은 2013년 말경부터 부도 무렵인 2014. 6. 경까지의 거래를...