Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Criminal facts

Defendants from around 21:00 on March 18, 2015 to the same year.

3. From September 25, 2015, E, the owner of the “D” game in Pyeongtaek-si up to 18:21:30, up to 18, established 40 game machine for “B” game, which is a game product that was not rated by the Board of Governors of the Game Water Rating Board, and had customers play the game using it and let customers play the game again, or exchange their names via money, the bearer name card issued in the same place, which is a security, was issued in the same place, so that they can easily conduct the business by accumulating the acquired points on the “Dano Card,” which is a security, and deliver them to customers, so that they can do so.

As a result, the Defendants could facilitate the violation of the laws on the promotion of the game industry as referred to in E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Copy of the police interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Seizure records;

1. On-site photographs (the Defendant asserted that an interview was conducted only without the commencement of the interview. However, according to the evidence above, the Defendants, upon entering the game room with the knowledge of illegal reduction, shall have the game room known to the illegal reduction, and receive KRW 60,000 per day from 9:0 to 9:00 per day from 9:00,000 after the day, and shall sufficiently recognize the fact that the game room started to work for employees of the game room from 9:0 to 9:0

Application of Statutes

1. Article 44 (1) 1, Article 28 subparagraph 2, Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 1, 32 (1) 7, and Article 32 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry;

1. Article 32(2) of the Criminal Act mitigated for aiding and abetting, and Article 55(1)3 of the same Act

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;