The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. Facts charged;

A. On October 2015, the Defendant of defamation: (a) at the C cafeteria located in Jinjin-si, Seoul around October 2015; and (b) even though the victim D did not engage in the Defendant’s abortion campaign against the Defendant for the purpose of G, which was a candidate for F representatives of the E non-regular branch, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by publicly pointing out false facts by publicly pointing out that “D is sected by G. . . . . . f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

B. Around April 7, 2016, the Defendant insultd the victim openly by saying, “The victim is snick, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten, frighten.”

2. Determination

(a) Accusation and intent of a victim: Article 312(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Rejection of public prosecution: subparagraphs 5 and 6 of Article 327 of the Criminal Procedure Act;