logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2016.11.22 2016고정516
업무방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are community residents residing in Kimcheon-siF, and the victim H (29 years of age) who is the forest owner in G, from the beginning of June 2015, 2015, was able to prevent the passage of the village residents by cutting down strings at the entrance of forest roads entering the said forest and fields, leaving village conference to prevent the passage of the village residents, holding village conference, and driving the farming machines or vehicles into the said forest and fields to prevent the passage by parking crums, etc. on the farming roads entering the said forest and fields.

1. The Defendants engaged in general traffic obstruction in collusion as above, and interfered with traffic by parking the farming roads connected to the forests and fields above G, J, and K, Kimcheon-si from December 9, 2015 to December 20, 2015, which are connected with the forests and fields above G, J, and K, and by blocking the traffic.

2. The Defendants interfered with their duties, at the same time, at the same place as the preceding paragraph, interfered with the forestry business of the victims, such as softening and planting seeds and seedlings by force by blocking farming paths due to the Trackers and culers, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A, B, and C;

1. The defendant D's partial statement

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against Defendant D;

1. Each police statement concerning L;

1. Police investigation report (in relation to the submission of cadastral maps and additional pictures controlling farm paths, as to attachment of field photographs, attachment of photographs, addition of photographs, and written statements of complainants, etc.);

1. Defendant D does not intentionally prevent the passage of the vehicle, but rather, he merely gets off the vehicle due to the malfunction of the vehicle, and he was set up a light railer due to the drilling of the day, and thus there is no intention to obstruct traffic or interfere with business. However, according to the evidence of the judgment, it is acknowledged that according to the village conference, the Defendant conspired with other Defendants in collusion with other Defendants to park and stop the passage of the vehicle on the road that entered the victim’s forest and field, and the Defendant, while recognizing that the passage of other residents is hindered at the time, shall move the vehicle.

arrow