The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable for the lower court’s punishment (the imprisonment of three months, the suspension of execution of two years, the observation of protection, community service 160 hours, the lecture of compliance driving 40 hours).

2. The fact that the defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected in the judgment is favorable.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances of crime and circumstances after crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is deemed to be proper and too unreasonable, and therefore, the defendant's argument on the sentencing of the case is without merit, on the grounds that the defendant's punishment is too unreasonable, in light of the following factors: (a) the defendant supported the crime of this case even though he had been punished twice as the same crime; and (b) the fact that the defendant could have been punished including one punishment as a result of the crime of this case, including the fact that the defendant could have been punished once

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.