logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.02.04 2019나61543
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the first instance against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked, and that part shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a company that carries on bonded warehouse business, general warehouse business, trucking transport business, etc.

From May 2015, the Plaintiff was working as the Defendant’s employee by holding the position of “on-site warden.”

D has been employed by the Defendant from around January 2015 to January 2018.

B. On April 21, 2017, around 08:00, the Plaintiff and D were engaged in the work of cutting off the vinyl of the Pium calium, which was accumulated in the instant place, using the E-owned vehicle owned by the Defendant at the camping site of the Incheon Jung-gu Incheon Port (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”).

(c)

The Plaintiff, while carrying out the above work, was an accident that falls on the floor of the Pium calium sium (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

(d)

The Plaintiff suffered from an injury, such as an injury to an acute trauma, which has two or more open addresses, due to the instant accident.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 4, Gap evidence Nos. 6 through Gap evidence Nos. 12, Gap evidence and video Nos. 12 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness D of the first instance trial, and the purport before oral argument

2. Occurrence of liability for damages and limitation of liability;

A. As seen above, the Plaintiff suffered from injury, such as light booming, etc. due to the instant accident. According to the Plaintiff’s symptoms No. 10, Gap evidence No. 11, Gap evidence No. 12, Gap evidence No. 12, witness witness of the first instance trial, and the previous purport of the testimony and oral argument of the witness of the first instance trial, it was found that two high-level booms were attached to the boom boom of the Plaintiff’s vehicle. D operated the boom boom boom boom that was attached to the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s boom boom boom of the Plaintiff, up to the above part of the boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom 30 degrees from the above part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

arrow