logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.12.22 2016구합65344
처분무효확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Name of the power plant - solar power plant - Contents of the project: solar power generation - place of installation: Jeonbukan-gun C (number address: Da, Jinan-gun D) - Supply voltage: 22,905 - Equipment capacity: 89.35km;

A. On December 16, 2013, the Plaintiff obtained permission from the Governor of Jeollabuk-do to engage in the electric generation business (hereinafter “electric generation business of this case”) with the following content:

(hereinafter “instant first permission”). (b)

On the ground of Jinanan-gun E and F (the “former Jinan-gun D” was subject to registration conversion into E on June 27, 2014), the Plaintiff newly built the Gyeyang-gun Building (hereinafter “the instant livestock shed”), and obtained approval for the use of the instant livestock shed on June 25, 2014.

C. The Plaintiff applied to the Governor of Jeollabuk-do for the change of the location of the instant initially permitted power generation business to the upper part of the instant stable building. On November 5, 2014, the Governor of Jeollabuk-do permitted the change of the instant power generation business to the effect as above.

(hereinafter “instant change”). D.

On January 16, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a solar-powered installation contract with the UNMS Co., Ltd., and began to install power generation facilities for the instant power generation business (facilities management number: PV15-R-0141; hereinafter “instant facilities”) from that time. On December 10, 2015, the Plaintiff was subject to the pre-use inspection by the president of the Korea Electrical Safety Corporation.

E. On January 22, 2016, the Plaintiff applied for the confirmation of the facilities subject to the issuance of supply certificates with respect to the instant facilities to the Defendant. On March 22, 2016, the Defendant deemed that the instant facilities fall under the case where the existing facilities, such as the building, etc., were not used, and the weight 1.2 is applied until 10kW, and the exceeding part, applying weight 1.0, applying weight 1.0 to weight to the foregoing, the Plaintiff indicates that the Defendant applied weight 1.02 to the deposit by the respective unit of the facilities applied as above.

A. The facility confirmation subject to a supply certificate.

arrow