logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.03.14 2018가단319319
채무부존재확인
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuit, the No. 12 of the No. C No. 2015 No. 3000, the No. 3000,000.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, who is the husband of the Plaintiff, committed suicide on August 2013 due to a business depression by the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the deceased”), and the auction was conducted for the house where the deceased died due to the remaining debt. On June 2014, the Plaintiff was introduced the Defendant from the seat of the deceased to receive assistance from various legal issues, such as inheritance, auction, and collection of claims.

B. 1) On January 5, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant borrowed KRW 30,000,000 from the Defendant on December 4, 2013 as the maturity date, June 30, 2014, and damages for delay, at 25% per annum between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.”

(2) On April 20, 2015, the Plaintiff drafted a notarial deed on a monetary loan agreement (No. 534, 2015, No. 200,000) stating that “the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 50,00,000 from the Defendant on December 30, 2012, at a rate of 20% per annum on June 30, 2013 and for delay damages,” between the Defendant and the Defendant.

C. On August 4, 2015, the Defendant applied for a seizure and collection order against the Plaintiff’s deposit claim based on the instant No. 1 Deed as Busan District Court’s Branch Branch Branch 2015TTT7163, and received a seizure and collection order from the said court on August 5, 2015.

On June 29, 2016, the defendant was prosecuted against the plaintiff et al. for the following criminal facts, and was sentenced to three years of imprisonment by Busan District Court 2016Kadan2517. The defendant appealed as Busan District Court 2016No2623. The above appellate court sentenced the plaintiff et al. to three years of imprisonment with prison labor on November 4, 2016.

Therefore, although the defendant appealed by Supreme Court Decision 2016Do19427, the above judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive on January 6, 2017.

arrow