The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of crime regarding the insult of F among the facts charged in the instant case changed.

Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules.

On the other hand, although the prosecutor stated "wholly" in the column for the scope of the appeal in the petition of appeal, the part dismissing the public prosecution on the grounds of the judgment below is not submitted within the statutory period, and the petition of appeal does not contain any specific grounds for appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.