logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 제천지원 2018.10.17 2017가단1314
공유물분할
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant B shall be dismissed.

2. The real estate listed in paragraph 1 of the annex shall be put up for auction.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The real estate listed in paragraph 1 of the attached list is owned by the Plaintiff 1/5 shares, by Defendant C 1/5 shares, by Defendant D 2/5 shares, and by Defendant E 1/5 shares.

B. The real estate listed in Attachment List No. 2 is owned by the Plaintiff 41/50 shares, Defendant C’s shares, Defendant C’s shares of 1/50 shares, Defendant D’s shares of 2/50 shares, Defendant E’s shares of 1/50 shares, Defendant H’s shares of 3/280 shares, Defendant H’s shares of 2/280 shares, Defendant J’s shares of 2/280, Defendant JF’s shares of 7/280, Defendant G’s shares of 7/280, Defendant G’s shares of 3/280, Defendant C’s shares of 2/280, and Defendant M’s shares of 2/280 shares, respectively.

[Ground of recognition] Gap evidence No. 1 (including paper numbers), and the result of each fact-finding on the broad time of this court's broad name, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. On the premise that the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant B is lawful, the Plaintiff sought a partition of co-owned property as the Defendant under the premise that he is the co-owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

However, comprehensively taking account of the respective entries and arguments in Gap evidence No. 1 (including additional numbers), Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer for 1/5 shares of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet on May 23, 201, due to inheritance from April 12, 1991, but it can be recognized that Defendant D completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the above shares on February 27, 2017.

Therefore, Defendant B is not a co-owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet, and the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against Defendant B is unlawful.

3. Determination as to claims against the remaining Defendants other than Defendant B

A. According to the above facts acknowledged as the co-owner of the right to partition co-owned property, the Plaintiff, who is the co-owner of the real estate listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1, against Defendant C, D, and E, other co-owners, may file a co-owned property partition claim against Defendant C, D, E, H, H, I, J, F, G, K, L, and M, other co-owners, pursuant to Article 269(1) of the Civil Act.

B. Co-owned property partition

arrow