logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.08.21 2020고정889
과실치상
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is raising a family main book in the facts charged.

Any person has a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger due to escape of animals through thorough management and supervision of animals he/she raises.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the opening of the opening and cleaned out of the open opening entrance without locked the entrance door of the opening, and caused these dogs to escape from the opening entrance of the opening entrance on January 17, 2020, and then, around 16:00 on January 17, 2020, the Defendant laid down the victim C (52 years old, female) and the victim D (26 years old, female) who were frighted in front of the Sinsan City, beyond C, and d (numbbbs) beyond C, and carried out d face, hand, left hand, and bucks.

As a result, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty of care, thereby causing injury to the victim C, such as damage to the salvble sale and hand, which requires approximately one week of medical treatment, and injury to the victim D, such as a salkyl chloride dale, which requires about three weeks of medical treatment, respectively.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 266 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act.

C. On May 1, 2020, after the prosecution of this case, a written agreement between the victims on May 1, 2020, stating that they would not want punishment of the defendant is submitted to this court.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow