beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant operated a steel distribution company with the trade name of “(ju)D” in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 3 commercial buildings, and was notified from around April 2006 to around April 2009 that the outstanding amount would be suspended from trading from the victim F who received steel supply, such as H-sn beam, from the victim F who operated (ju) 7 Dong in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Geumcheon-gu 7 Dong from around 2006 to around April 2009.
After that, in order to normalize the operation of the company by re-transaction with the victim who was unable to operate the company in early June 2009, the defendant was the victim's land inherited to G in Gyeonggi-do, but the land was expropriated in the land construction work and the interim compensation was made in September.
The payment of the outstanding amount would be paid in the money, which would cause the delivery of steel and make a transaction with the victim again.
1. The Defendant, on June 12, 2009, made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay the price to the victim by July 15, 2009, on the part of the owner who supplied steel at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site at the building site.”
However, in fact, most of the bills issued by the Defendant were refused to pay for the goods from the customer, and the outstanding amounts that were not paid to the customer were much and the employee was not properly paid, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay for the steel to the victim, such as paying for the obligations to others and using them as personnel expenses for others.
In addition, since the compensation for the above G land was not determined at any time, the defendant was unable to receive the compensation until the due date, and there was no ability to pay the steel price to the victim with the compensation for the land.
On June 12, 2009, the Defendant: (a) on June 12, 2009, H-B 300 x 300 x 300 x 300 x 300 x 300 x 16 x 16 x 1.