Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B is a person who served as the chief of the cooking office of the general restaurant called “D” in the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

No one shall indicate or advertise foods, etc. differently from facts or exaggerated ones with respect to the names, manufacturing methods, quality and nutrition labelling, genetically modified foods, etc. and food traceability labelling.

Nevertheless, between June 23, 201 and June 15, 2013, the Defendant indicated the “D” general restaurant for “D” as “domination” to customers, which is an import-oriented pro rata ship, and made a false indication as to the name of food, etc., by indicating the “D” general restaurant for “D” to be provided to customers.

2. Defendant A is a person who operates a general restaurant called “D” in Seocheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-si C.

From June 23, 2011 to June 15, 2013, the Defendant committed the Defendant’s act of violation as prescribed in paragraph (1) at a general restaurant of “D” as an employee of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Photographs;

1. Application of each Act and subordinate statutes to data on the Internet, detailed statement of transactions, management ledger of business reports, business trip reports (sale details of supply businesses), business report certificates, and business registration certificates, and copies of business registration certificates;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent law on criminal facts: Articles 100, 97 subparag. 1, and 13(1)2 of the Food Sanitation Act; Article 97 subparag. 1 and Article 13(1)2 of the Food Sanitation Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act