logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.06.10 2016고정89
업무상과실치사
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is a person who directly instructs the members of the F Co., Ltd. as the director of the F Co., Ltd., the contractor of the E Heat pipeline work in progress in D at the time of Jin-si, and Defendant A is a person in charge of safety management of the said F Co., Ltd. as the vice-director of the F Co., Ltd., and Defendant C is a person who controls and supervises the said work as the director of the F Co., Ltd.,

On September 12, 2015, Defendants engaged in the excavation of roads for underground heat pipelines in Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si on September 11, 2015 (20 meters wide, about 20 meters long, about 20 meters in depth).

Since there are other vehicles, etc. passing through, in such cases, Defendant B, the head of the construction division, installed a container, etc. that may induce the flow of construction fences, front and rear sides traffic, etc. to prevent safety accidents in accordance with the road construction report submitted in advance, and takes safety measures through thorough prevention of traffic accidents and pedestrian accidents, such as fixing traffic control personnel, and Defendant A, who is the person in charge of safety management, has the duty to prevent accidents in advance by inspecting whether the above safety measures have been properly taken place, and Defendant C, the head of the site site, has the duty of care to prevent accidents by managing and supervising Defendant B and Defendant A from neglecting the above duties.

Nevertheless, Defendant B did not install construction fences to prevent the above accident, and even though the signal number did not perform the signal duty, Defendant A did not confirm whether the above construction gate was installed, etc., and Defendant C driven Ga (79 years old) with the victim G (the victim) who driven the above gate where Defendant C was negligent in neglecting the management and supervision over Defendant B and Defendant A by neglecting the above management and supervision over the above gate.

CT100.

arrow