(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.11.17 2020고정30

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2020.11.17 2020고정30

상해

Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the one who was able to teach the victim B (the age of 20) and about four months.

On November 3, 2019, the Defendant 13th apartment of the Daegu-gu apartment on the 13th floor of the apartment of the 13th floor in which the victim had scam with the victim's left side at one time, and caused the victim to scam in excess of the defendant's bridge, and caused the victim's left side to scam on two occasions, and caused the victim's right-hand side buck by drinking in the second place, and caused the buckbucks to scam, against it, the Defendant scam the victim's head scam, against it, and scam the victim's head scam with his hand, and caused the victim's chest to scam with the victim's chest.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as the trees not on the days of treatment and the diagnosis and injury on the breast part.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

2. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

3. Some statements made in the police interrogation protocol concerning B;

4. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes shall not be deemed to constitute a justifiable act that does not violate the legal self-defense or social rules to defend the current unfair infringement, on the ground that the Defendant’s act was committed including the intent of attack beyond the passive act of defense, and it cannot be deemed reasonable in the means and method of action, and it cannot be deemed as an urgent and inevitable means, given that the Defendant’s act constitutes a legitimate act that does not violate the current rules of self-defense or social rules, although the Defendant asserts that his act constitutes a legitimate act as a self-defense or passive defense.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

2. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

3. Circumstances that can be considered in light of the circumstances of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2016.05.13 2015고정1179

-서울북부지방법원 2018.06.15 2018고정721

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.03.27 2013고정4123

-부산지방법원 2014.10.30 2014고정1606

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2021.01.13 2020고정804