Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to a fine of two million won in violation of the Medical Service Act at the Seoul Central District Court on December 18, 2013 and was sentenced to a fine of two million won in the same electricity, and Defendant B was sentenced to a fine of five million won in the same court on July 4, 2012.

A person who is not accredited by the competent authority cannot open a massage treatment establishment and cannot perform massage activities. Defendant A operated the massage business with the trade name of “G” on the second floor of the building located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F from April 1, 2013 to March 23:00, and Defendant B operated the massage business from January 1, 2014 to January 2014.

3. From February 13, 2014 to February 23:00, Defendant C had been working as an employee of the above business place and actually managed overall work of the business place, including management of female employees to commute to and from work and guidance of customers. The same year from February 13, 2014

3. From 23:00 until 23:00, he worked as an employee of the above establishment and served as a member of the employee and served as a member of the customer.

Defendant

A and Defendant B provided 8 rooms with shower facilities and 3 rooms in the above businesses for the above period of time, employed female employees, such as Defendant C and H (tentative name) who did not obtain the recognition of a massage club from the competent administrative agency, and let the said female employees find the place, and let them engage in the massage act by taking custody of the telegraph in his hands or by taking custody of it, and Defendant C performed the massage act without obtaining the recognition of a massage club as above.

As a result, Defendant A establishes a massage treatment establishment without recognition of Marine’s qualifications, and Defendants conspired to do so from February 13, 2014 to the same year.

3. From 13.23:00 to 23:00, an unqualified horse for profit.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs, lease contract.