logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2013.07.26 2013노189
상해
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

Reasons

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, although the court below found the victim guilty of the facts charged.

2. Determination

A. On April 15, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 07:20 on the part of the Defendant: (b) performed the construction of access roads from “F” located in “F” on the part of “F; and (c) performed the construction of access roads from “F” on the part of “F; and (d) performed the construction of the Defendant’s fright to resist the part of the Defendant’s issues; and (c) performed the fright of the victim H (age 67) on one occasion, flad the flabing part of the flab, and flad

On the ground that the victim A(the 62 years of age) was sprinking and sprinking the Defendant's hand, the Defendant continued to sprinked A's bat and spacked the Defendant's bat, etc. on the inside.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim H such as the old satis, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and inflicted injury on the victim A such as the satis, which requires approximately one week of medical treatment.

B. The lower court’s judgment: (a) at the time of the instant case, the Defendant suffered injury, such as divesing and destroying flapsing, which requires treatment for about three (3) weeks by the victim A with flapsing flapsing, etc.; (b) immediately after the instant case, the Defendant transferred to an emergency room and was hospitalized on May 30, 2012 after being transmitted to the hospital; and (c) the Defendant was incapable of defending himself as a woman of the body that was flapsing with the face-to-mathic disorder 1 in the left-hand flab, while the Defendant was unable to defend himself (it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s physical condition at the time was flapsing without the aid device or that the flapsing power of the left flapsing of another; and (c) the victims appears not to have been so, not only the investigative agencies and legal statements of the victims at the time, but also the Defendant’s physical condition at the time.

arrow