1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Nonparty C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”)

A) The purpose of this is to manufacture and sell furnitures. A. A. A. A. a company that aims to manufacture and sell furnitures. A. B. A. A. A. B. (a) around March 201, it was requested by the KON Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “KON”) to supply home shopping 3backs for the purpose of selling home shopping, and C and KON traded a number of households other than intended ones.

To this end, the non-party D (mutual name: E) requested the production of “one-way, etc.,” which is a part of the 3back’s 3back’s 3back’s , and supplied it to the non-party F, who is the assembly company, and the F assembled together with other parts and supplied it to the KON, and the KON sold it through the home shopping broadcasting operated by the non-party ES shopping.

3) Since the frequent increase in the unit price of the chaired person supplied by D, C decided to independently produce the chaired person, etc., and around April 15, 201, Nonparty G (trade name H and Plaintiff’s father) appears to have been in partnership with Nonparty I, who is the father of the Plaintiff, around April 15, 2011.

In the process of concluding a contract for the supply of goods to produce and supply chairs, etc., C loaned KRW 20 million operating car to G on May 6, 2011. For this purpose, C, which was newly intended to produce gold bars. C, which was a staff member of C, presented some modified designs, such as adding the quantity of doors connected with the animal face to the design of the chair receiver supplied by D from March 201 to Nov. 201. According to Article 6 of the contract, G, according to the direction of production, drawings, other books and instructions issued by C, it is stated that the product is manufactured in accordance with Article 6 of the contract.