A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:15 on October 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated in Seogu-gu, Seogu, Seo-gu, that “Neggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation and public security affairs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the place of work in the D District;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., confession, reflective fact, assault against police officers one time, and the fact that there is no other criminal record except for a fine imposed on one time due to occupational injury or injury);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;