Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for two years.

The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 16, 2018, at around 20:23, the Defendant operated a public office bus in the New Scza fishing, and turn to the left the intersection of the public office 1489, from the front city line to the boundary of the public office intersection from the front city line.

At this point, since the traffic control is conducted by signal apparatus, the defendant, who was engaged in driving service, had a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the signals, suffered from the injury of the victim C (the victim F (the victim F, the victim 24 years old), who is the passenger of the above bus, by taking the front part of the victim C(the victim 30 years old)'s front part of the cargo II under the opposite part due to the occupational negligence that led to the left-hand turn. The above victim suffered from the serious injury, such as the multi-fluoring dives, etc. that the victim did not require treatment for about 23 weeks at the left-hand end of the bus. The victim E (the victim 26 years old), who was accompanied by the above cargo, suffered from the injury, such as an acute refluoring alcohol during about 8 weeks in need of treatment for about 5 weeks, by taking the victim F (the victim F (the victim 24 years old) who is the passenger of the above bus.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of F, G, E, and C;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the actual condition, report on the site of a traffic accident, and each medical certificate;

1. Report on internal investigation (number 7), investigation report (number 15);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by cutting off on-site photographs, signal system photographs and images at the intersections of traffic accidents;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An order to attend a lecture or an order to attend a community service center for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act is highly likely to cause damage to three victims, such as the defendant's negligence on duty, and the occurrence of the victim who cut the two legs, while driving urban buses for the reason of sentencing.

The defendant is a person who has an occupation and is engaged in driving.