logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.05.18 2018고정19
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director, the representative director, located in Gwangju Mine-gu B, who runs a manufacturing business.

Defendant 2,137,500 each wage of 2,137,500 won, total of 14,962,500 won, retirement pay, 4,806,000 won, from December 4, 2016 to June 10, 2017, did not pay within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline between the parties.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 109(1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act, Article 44 Subparag. 1 and Article 9 of the Workers’ Retirement Benefits Guarantee Act;

(b) Crimes of non-criminal punishment: Article 109 (2) of the Labor Standards Act, the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

C. Expression of intent that workers D does not want to punish the Defendant on May 18, 2018

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow