A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

The seized chip game 49 (No. 1), the table p. 49 (No. 2).

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a game hall in the name of “E” on the third floor above the Seoul Jung-gu D ground.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase of tangible or intangible results (referring to game money prescribed by Presidential Decree and things similar thereto prescribed by Presidential Decree, such as points, premiums and virtual currency used in game) obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, the defendant from January 15, 2016 to the same year.

4. From the end of 17, by installing a black chip game using the table PC in the above game, and allowing F, G, etc. to play a game, and deducting 10% of the remaining points that F, G, etc. play a game as commission, and exchange the results obtained by using a game by exchanging money in cash after deducting 10% as commission fees.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Application of the statutes governing registration certificates, on-site photographs, recording books, and sound recording CDs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Act on the Promotion of the Alternative Game Industry, and Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Act on the Promotion of Confiscation Industry and Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case when it comes to this court. Meanwhile, the scale and duration of the crime of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case, even though he had a record of punishment of one sentence on September 201, 201 after the punishment of two suspended sentence for the same crime of this case was imposed on the same kind of crime, and the defendant attempted to destroy evidence at the investigation stage, such as providing the first reporter with money at the investigation stage and submitting a false certificate of fact after receiving a false report.