logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.04.23 2015고단53
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment 2015 order 53]

1. A thief, around 10:00 on April 1, 2013, at 365 cm from the office of resignation of the livestock industry cooperative located in 259, in order to resign from the office of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Cheongju, the Defendant: (a) released KRW 2.8 million in cash from June 12, 2013, in an automatic cash payment machine managed by the office of resignation for the victims of livestock industry established therein; (b) and then withdrawn KRW 2,939,00,000 in cash from that time to June 12, 2013.

2. From March 15, 2013 to May 15, 2013, the Defendant transferred KRW 35,600,000,000 to 111 times, as indicated in [2] the list of crimes in attached Form / [2] from March 15, 2013 to May 15, 2013, by inserting one cash card in the name of C, which was issued by C, and obtained from C, in the cash automatic machine installed therein, and taking a password known from C, and then transferring KRW 2.5 million from the account in the name of C, which is the victim, to the Defendant’s creditor.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits equivalent to 35.6 million won in total by inputting information into a computer or any other information processing device without authority.

[2015 Highest 267]

3. On April 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The victim E is unable to obtain a house at a sloping district where it is difficult to know the trade name in the sloping Dong Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-

However, the defendant did not intend to purchase the house, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, he thought that he would use the money as a lawyer's fee for the defendant's punishment, and approximately KRW 80 million at that time.

arrow