logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.02.14 2018고정1158
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 07:05 on December 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim D(50 years of age) at the rest room C located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si; (b) carried the victim’s flab by drinking flaps; (c) carried the victim’s face twice by drinking flab; and (d) carried the victim’s left side bridge up to the upper bed.

On the same day, at around 07:15, the Defendant continued to sit in the driver’s seat in the above C parking lot, left the driver’s seat with the driver’s safety, knife the knife tape on his hand, taken the knife tape on one hand, knife the left knife, knife the left knife on one hand, and knife the left knife on one hand, and again, knife the back of the victim by the victim who moves knife the knife.

At around 08:30 on the same day, the Defendant continued to set up the victim's left side buckbucks one time, and the chest was made one time by drinking knicks.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as 28 days of treatment at the right 28 days of treatment, such as 200 cage cages.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that although there were the facts of assaulting the victim at around 07:05 and around 07:15 on the day of the instant case, illegality as a legitimate act is dismissed, and around 08:30, there was no assault against the victim, and the victim did not suffer injury as stated in the facts charged by the defendant's assault act.

However, the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, namely, ① the victim specifically stated in the investigation agency and this court about the background during which the victim was challenged with the Defendant at the time of the instant case, ② according to the respective statements in workplace E and F, the Defendant and the victim were verbally in dispute.

arrow