logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.09 2019가합521545
회사에 관한 소송
Text

Of the instant lawsuits, the part concerning the request for dismissal of directors shall be dismissed.

The plaintiffs' respective remaining claims against Defendant F, G, and H.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) is a company established to manage and operate the whole of the I commercial buildings in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant commercial buildings”) and its ancillary facilities.

The shareholders of the Defendant Company consist of the instant commercial buildings and their owners, and the total number of shares issued by the Defendant Company is 10,000 shares.

2) Plaintiff A is the shareholders of the Defendant Company who own 75 shares issued by Defendant Company, 39 shares by Plaintiff B, 33 shares by Plaintiff C, and 48 shares by Plaintiff D.

3) From May 1992, Defendant F is working as a director of the Defendant Company from around June 2015, Defendant G from around June 2015, and Defendant H is working as a director of the Defendant Company from around June 2018.

B. Shareholders, including the Plaintiffs, etc., demanded the Defendant Company to convene a general meeting of shareholders on November 1, 2018 for the purpose of a meeting to dismiss the directors of Defendant F, G, and H, but the general meeting of shareholders was not convened.

2) Shareholders, including the Plaintiffs, filed an application for a temporary general meeting of shareholders with the Seoul Central District Court 2018 non-conforming 30258 for a permit to convene a temporary general meeting of shareholders of the Defendant Company for the purpose of meeting the case of dismissal of the directors of Defendant F, G, and H. The said court permitted the convening of a temporary general meeting of shareholders of the Defendant Company for the purpose of meeting the case of dismissal of the directors of Defendant F, G, and H on January 15, 2019, and decided to dismiss the rest of the agenda.

3) The Plaintiffs intended to hold a temporary general meeting of shareholders of the Defendant Company on March 8, 2019 in accordance with the above decision to permit the convocation of the temporary general meeting of shareholders, but did not present the dismissal agenda.

(c)

The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendant F, G, and H to the charge of liability against the defendant F, G, and H on April 3, 2019. "Defendant F, who leased the warehouse under the name of the defendant F, a public property of the defendant company, to sublet it or transferred it upon receiving premium."

arrow