1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. One-half of the costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, and the remainder by the Defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 13, 2017, the Plaintiff served in Company B, and was subject to the right-side frame (hereinafter “the instant injury and disease”). Around April 13, 2017, around 19:00, the Plaintiff went beyond the stairs of the main body to the main body of Seodaemun-gu.

On May 24, 2017, the Plaintiff obtained medical care (hereinafter “first medical care”) from the Defendant until December 18, 2017 after obtaining approval from the Defendant as an occupational accident.

B. After the first medical care, the Plaintiff applied for disability benefits on December 21, 2017.

On January 22, 2018, the Defendant determined that the Plaintiff’s right development disorder was class 10, class 12, class 10, class 14, and class 10, class 12, class 10, and class 12, class 10.

Accordingly, the Defendant paid 8,502,340 won disability benefits to the Plaintiff.

C. Since then, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care with the Defendant on the ground that the injury or disease in the instant case was aggravated due to the aggravation of her leader caused by the misappropriation, etc., and the Defendant approved the additional medical care on May 18, 2018, and the Plaintiff re-medical care from April 30, 2018 to August 15, 2018.

After that, the Plaintiff filed a claim for disability benefits after additional medical care on December 6, 2018.

On January 24, 2019, the Defendant did not recognize the function disorder of the Plaintiff’s right-hand part, and did not pay disability benefits to the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff’s disability was not aggravated (hereinafter “the original disposition in this case”).

The Defendant changed the original disposition of this case according to the decision of the court's recommendation for conciliation during the proceeding of the lawsuit of this case, and judged the grade of disability on the right side of the Plaintiff as class 12th 15 (hereinafter "the disposition of this case").

On the third day, the Plaintiff changed the purport of the claim to the revocation of the original disposition of this case from seeking the revocation of the original disposition of this case, and the Defendant did not specifically raise any objection, which is claimed by this court on the same day.