Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,500,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 29, 2014, at around 06:45, Defendant A received a clause, “bruptly la” from the victim B (the age of 49) who was seated next to, and had a dispute over, women’s friendliness within the “E” located in the third floor of the D Building in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, at around 06:45, the Defendant took a look at the victim’s face, hair, head, and side glass.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim B, such as salt pansium, tensions, etc., which require approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place described in paragraph (1), as seen above, when the victim A (years 34) and scam was faced with the head of the victim first, he was scamed to scam the head of the victim by scaming the victim’s head, scaming the victim’s face, etc., kneeing the victim’s face, and kneing the victim’s chest part on the kneb, and kneing the victim’s head by gathering the scam on the kneb.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim A, such as cutting a 4-day aggregate on the left-hand side in need of approximately five weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A medical certificate;

1. Ct v photographs and damaged photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (B injury diagnosis report);

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In the process of fighting without accompanying each other’s reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant B’s intention and scam, and Defendant A’s act did not constitute a crime in light of the fact that he collected the booms located in the coffee shop, and Defendant A had the same criminal record for the Defendants (Defendant A: one fine, one time, and two times, fine).