logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.30 2016노2083
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The court below found the defendant not guilty of a traffic danger or obstacle due to a traffic accident caused by the defendant's summary of the grounds for appeal. The court below erred in the misapprehension of facts.

2. As the judgment of the court below is revealed, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone that the defendant issued a traffic hazard and obstacle due to a traffic accident caused by the defendant, when considering the following: (i) the damaged vehicle was destroyed to a flick degree of flick, and there was no produce; and (ii) the repair cost based on a written estimate was limited to approximately KRW 600,000; and (iii) the injured party was divided into the victim and the victim left the scene of the reported defect.

It is difficult to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow