1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant decided to invest money in the name of the Defendant’s husband in D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”), a multi-level company via C (hereinafter “State”), and remitted KRW 44,00,000 to C’s account on October 22, 2008. However, around November 1, 2008, the above multi-level company is liable for investment money to B, a defaulted company, and on January 28, 201, the date of preparation of the loan agreement in the holding on January 28, 201, appears to have been on January 28, 2011, not on January 22, 2011, and on January 28, 2011, the Defendant did not seem to have any substantial disadvantage in exercising the Defendant’s right to defense as the date of preparation of the loan agreement as asserted by the Defendant and his defense counsel. Thus, the criminal facts are recognized as above.

D. The term “detailed installment repayment date and amount of repayment” and “interest” were left blank and were issued a loan agreement with the loan amount of KRW 48.3 million.

On February 24, 2011, the Defendant received a certification of the content of “request for the withdrawal of a tea certificate” from C, and had the intent to complete the content of the loan agreement and file an application for provisional seizure of C’s real estate.

1. The Defendant altered private documents at a place where the place is unknown at that time and indicated “the date of repayment” in the column of “detailed installment payment date and amount to be repaid” in the form of the loan agreement at a place where the said place is unknown, as indicated “the date of repayment” in the column of “the date of detailed installment payment and amount to be repaid”. The Defendant stated “the date of repayment” as “the date of repayment” in the “amount of payment” in the “amount of payment” in the said form of loan agreement,” “10,000,000,000,10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,80,8,8,3000,8,300, 300, 8,000, 300, 300, 300, 8, 300, 000,” and “the column 2.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant modified one copy of the loan agreement in the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On September 1, 201, the Defendant changed the foregoing to a staff-in-charge who could not know the fact of the change in the Daegu District Court Kim Jong-dong located in Kim Jong-dong, Taecheon-si.