logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.06.02 2015고정836
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 6, 2014 to September 5, 2014, the Defendant obstructed the business of the Defendant from around August 6, 2014 to around September 5, 2014, up to the period from around August 6, 2014 to around September 5, 2014, the electric power of the washing room, linked to the electric power distribution box of the washing room, which was leased and used by the injured party without any change, before the electric power distribution box of the commercial building located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, in which the Defendant partially leased to the injured party C, led the Defendant not to operate.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by allowing the victim who is engaged in food manufacturing business in the above building to not normally perform duties.

2. On September 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the place indicated in paragraph 1 around September 5, 2014, the Defendant: (b) extracted electric lines connected to the distribution of electricity from No. 104 to E without any doubt from the victim; and (c) caused the electricity of the washing room not to operate.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by allowing the victim who is engaged in food manufacturing business in the above building to not normally perform duties.

3. On September 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the places indicated in paragraph (1) around 18:15 to 18:45 on September 8, 2014, the Defendant, who interfered with one’s business, caused F to keep the electricity of the washing room, which was connected to the electric distribution of electricity of 102, the leased property by the victim, without any doubt with the victim, so that the electricity of the washing room is not operated.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's business by allowing the victim who is engaged in food manufacturing business in the above building to not normally perform duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of a defendant in part in the protocol of second public trial;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. The part concerning the witness G's statement in the fifth public trial protocol;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. G certification;

1. A report on investigation (a statement from a witness G);

1. Screening photographs of cut electric wires, and on-site CCTV records;

arrow