Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

In order to prevent infectious diseases, the Minister of Health and Welfare, a Mayor/Do Governor, or the head of a Si/Gun/Gu shall take measures to hospitalize or isolate the infected at an appropriate place for a certain period, or take some measures necessary therefor, and no person who has received such measures shall

On August 12, 2020, the Defendant visited the “CSari” located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan.

On August 22, 2020, the Defendant fell under an infectious diseaseeer F (Additional No. G) who visited the above CJ around August 12, 2020 from a public official E in charge of the public health clinic in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do around August 22, 2020, and the same line overlaps with that of the above CV around August 12, 2020, and thus, the Defendant is isolated at the above residence from August 22, 2020 to August 26, 2020.

‘The notification' was received by the excursion ship.

Nevertheless, at around 11:30 to 13:00 on August 24, 2020, the Defendant violated his isolation measures without justifiable grounds, such as visiting the motherel located in Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's statutory statement and written request for accusation (including attached materials), investigation report (the call of a public official in charge of accusation) (the call of the public official in charge of accusation), investigation report (Confirmation of C

1. Article 79-3 Subparag. 5 of the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act (amended by Act No. 17472 of Aug. 11, 2020) and Article 49(1)14 of the former Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act (amended by Act No. 17472 of Aug. 11, 202), the selection

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant's act of sentencing under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is likely to circumvent the efforts of the State and the people for the prevention and suppression of infectious diseases, and it does not seem that there was an additional spread of virus due to the defendant's violation of the measures for self-regulation, and the defendant's act is against the law.