1. On January 9, 2020, the part concerning personal information in attached Form 2 among the information on the request for disclosure filed by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on January 9, 2020.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 10, 2015, the Plaintiff forged three copies of the Plaintiff’s name with the content that “B is confirmed to have repaid the full amount of the debt to the Plaintiff and do not raise any objection due to any legal issues” with respect to KRW 40.5 million with respect to the debt to the Plaintiff.”

“The instant case” submitted a written complaint (hereinafter “the instant case”). B. On December 17, 2015, the prosecutor in charge of the instant case at the Office of Government Local Public Prosecutor’s Office rendered a disposition that there was no suspicion as to the suspected charge of the crime of forging a private document against B and the crime of committing the crime of robbery of the said investigation document.

(c)

On January 9, 2020, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to disclose information in attached Form 1 (hereinafter “information subject to claim”) written out in the instant case.

(d)

On January 9, 2020, the Defendant issued a disposition against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”) rejecting the Plaintiff’s application on the ground that “The disclosure of records is likely to seriously undermine the honor, privacy, physical safety, and peace of life of the persons related to the instant case (Article 22 subparag. 1 subparag. 2 of the former Rules on the Preservation of Public Prosecution (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice No. 993, Jan. 1, 2021; hereinafter “former Rules on the Preservation of Public Prosecution”)” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, Eul evidence Nos. 3 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s claim information is information necessary to relieve the Plaintiff’s infringement by b’s false statements. Since there is no ground to deny this, the instant disposition should be revoked, and the information subject to the claim should be disclosed to the Plaintiff.

B. Attached Form 3 of the relevant statutes are as stated in the relevant statutes.

(c)

Judgment

1) The requested information is subject to the former Information Disclosure Act.