The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court, based on the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, determined a sentence within the recommended range of the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee in consideration of ① the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times for the same kind of crime, but the Defendant committed the instant crime at the same time during the repeated crime period, the Defendant was unable to agree with the Victim K, ② the fact that the Defendant was aware of his mistake, and the fact that the Defendant agreed with the Victim G, etc., were set

The sentencing of the court below seems to have been determined appropriately by fully taking into account the above various circumstances, and there is no special change in circumstances to be assessed differently from the sentencing conditions of the court below until the trial is held.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relations, criminal records, circumstances after the crime and the result of the crime, all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable to escape the reasonable scope of discretion.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.