1. The Plaintiff. The Selection C shall be KRW 20,00 for the Selection, KRW 80,00 for the Selection and KRW 80,000 for each of the said amounts.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff, as a person operating an advertising counter event with the trade name “E”, is carrying out activities to display leafletss installed in the F University by issuing monthly leafletss, which carried out food advertisement of the delivery company around the F University, and to keep them in the crynas, etc.

The defendant is an organization of delivery companies that do not place an advertisement through the plaintiff, and is engaged in advertising activities within the F University in the same manner as the plaintiff.

The Selection C is a person who operates a skin house in the trade name of “G”, and the Selection D is a person who operates a Korean-style house in the trade name of “H”.

The designated parties are admitted to each defendant.

[Reasons for recognition] Facts without dispute. The purport of the Plaintiff’s argument as to the purport of the entire argument is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 30,100,000 in total due to larceny, damage to property, and display of the Plaintiff’s exclusive front book, etc.; and (b) the Defendant and the designated parties jointly are liable for compensation for the said damages.

Plaintiff

The amount of damages of the principal: The amount of damages equivalent to the production cost of KRW 8,100,00 (Section 16): ① KRW 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 on May 2, 2015 (the increase in the amount of damages caused by re-printed) on December 2, 2015: KRW 3,00,000 (the increase in the amount of damages caused by re-printed) on January 2, 2016; KRW 500,000,000,000,00 for two managers, such as the former 5,00,000,000,000,00 won (Section 16: 2 x 3,000,000,000,000,000,000) for one-months delegated by the Plaintiff, were determined by the Seoul District Court as to the Plaintiff’s.

According to the request for formal trial, the designated parties were implemented to the trial proceedings No. 2016 High Court Order 1728 (hereinafter referred to as "related cases").

1. Defendant C.