All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the Defendants and the defense counsel (e.g., the Defendants recognized the defendants' mistake and reflects the fact that the Defendants committed the instant crime because they were unable to live because they were engaged in a strike on the secondhand by leading the strike, and the prices of the bar uniforms stolen by the Defendants are 14,865,000 won in total or 5,000 won in sales of the bar uniforms, and if the Defendants offered various expenses, the actual gains of the Defendants are merely 1,50,000 won in total, and some damages were temporarily returned to the victims, and the Defendants were beneficiaries of basic life and persons with visual disability. In light of the above, the lower court’s imprisonment for 10 months with prison labor for the Defendants A and six months with prison labor for the Defendants B are excessively unreasonable.

2. The judgment of this case is that the defendants committed the crime of this case with the defendants' joint construction site and 13 times more than the market price of 14,865,00 won and it is not appropriate to commit the crime. The victims are majority and did not recover from damage to the trial. The defendant A could have a record of criminal punishment including the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daejeon District Court's Seosan Branch on December 2, 2005. The defendant B had no record of criminal punishment and has no record of economic situation and health status are already reflected in the sentencing factors favorable in the court below, and there is no special change of circumstances that might be considered in sentencing at the court below. The defendant B's sentence against the defendant is the lowest limit of the recommended punishment range set in the sentencing guidelines, taking into account the motive and circumstances of each crime of this case, the degree of damage before and after the crime of this case, the records of the crime, and other circumstances expressed by the defendants in the environment as stated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act.