logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.04.18 2018누65219
체류기간연장등불허결정처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (b) the two pages 1-2 of the first instance judgment as “E”; and (c) the attached Table 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (Article 10 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 12 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act) as “[Article 10 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 12 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 29163, Sept. 18, 2018)]”; and (d) five pages 8, “the spouse of the Plaintiff was illegally employed without permission for activities other than sojourn status from June 9, 2018 to July 11, 2018,” and (e) the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are stated, except for the addition of “A” as “E”, and Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow