logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2011.12.07 2011고단96
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for one year and six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.

Reasons

Criminal facts

Defendant

A The amount of KRW 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion to 3 billion from 1.9 billion to purchase I loan 9 households located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H (hereinafter “the following”) and then prepare a business fund by obtaining profits from the market price at remaining, resale, or as a security. Once the Defendant B purchased 300 million won from 1.3 billion won to 300 million won as security and conducted the business by purchasing 1 loan from 300 million won to 300 million won, the Defendant B transferred the ownership of 103 billion from 103 won in the name of the Defendant B or the financial provider, and discussed between the Defendant B to resell it or use it as a church, and the Defendants conspired with the contents of the business related to the loan of this case to a third party and received the money.

Defendant

B around September 19, 2009, at the K pharmacy in the operation of the victim G in the Heak-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju, "A has the general right to sell L, and H has the right to dispose of H 9 bonds. One bond is 1 billion won to KRW 1.5 billion, and one bond can be purchased in KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000 won, and one bond can be obtained gains profits from selling.In order to establish a church in Mdong, if one loan is borrowed in KRW 300,000,000,000, one loan will be purchased and sold and returned within two months, and the remainder will be used to establish a church."

However, in fact, Defendant A was aware of the legal dispute over the loan of this case by purchasing it at a low price, and did not have any authority to purchase or dispose of it in addition to the abstract plan to obtain profits from the resale. Of the loan of this case, 103 among the loan of this case did not have a right to a site. The execution project of the loan of this case can purchase only the share of land belonging to the above household as a whole.

arrow