A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received 112 reports in front of the C Pharmacy located in Ansan-si B; and (b) returned from E and F, a police officer belonging to the D District Police Station of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station who called the site after receiving 112 reports; and (c) received 16:50 reports.

(1) the Corporation has received the request.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, committed an assault, such as drinking alcohol, following the Defendant’s voice, “Absson, but killed,” and assaulting the police officer E’s face, and continuing drinking, following the above police officer’s face.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on Probation and Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] Where the degree of violence, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor for the mitigation area of Grade I (Obstruction of Performance of Duties and Force of Duties) [Special Mitigation] [Determination of Sentence] (Determination of Punishment] Crimes against police officers; contingent crimes; police officers are not consistent with punishment; there are no criminal records of the same kind other than fines due to violence in 2000; and there are no criminal records of the same kind other than fines due to violence in 200; consideration of the following: