logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.10.21 2016고단1736
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 14, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on drinking), and a fine of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court on March 9, 2015. On May 4, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime and for two years of suspension of execution on May 12, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 12, 2016.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person driving Cene car;

On March 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 0.106% alcohol level on the front of DE at Priju-si on March 6, 2016, while driving the said car at a speed of 0.106% from the upstream of the Geumju Police Station.

At the time, since the vehicle is at night and is a one-way traffic, since the vehicle traffic and parking is frequent, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed of the person who drives the vehicle, and to properly manipulate the steering gear and the brake system, thereby preventing the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, was unable to discover the G rocketing car driven by F on the side side of the road bed down on the side of the road at the time when the walking is difficult to drive normally to the extent that the horses are under the influence of alcohol and the walking is under the influence of the vehicle of F as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle due to the negligence that was driven without discovering, while the vehicle of F was under the influence of the vehicle.

As above, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim H (V, 24 years old) who was on board a F car due to occupational negligence while driving a car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, such as catum catum which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Although the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) had the record of being punished three times due to drunk driving, the Defendant can find out the trade name in the salary-day at the time of sowing at the time of sowing, as described in paragraph (1).

arrow