1. The Defendants shall be against the designated parties listed in the list of the Plaintiffs (Appointeds) and the designated parties listed in the separate sheet in the E-Eup.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties indicated in the separate sheet of the designated parties (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff, etc.”) are children of the networkF, and the Defendants are children of the network G.

On March 8, 1948, the registration of ownership transfer was made on December 9, 1948 on the E large 232 square meters (on the present land cadastre indication: 767 square meters before E; hereinafter “instant real estate”).

On December 20, 1985, the netF began to purchase and possess the instant real estate owned by the network G.

The deceased G died on January 16, 2006, and the Defendants, as their children, are the Defendants.

The deceased on November 28, 2007, the deceased on November 28, 2007, and there is the plaintiff, who is his children.

[Based on the recognition, Defendant B and C have the burden of proving the statute of limitations for the acquisition of real estate by asserting that the possessor has no intention to own it, and rather, the possessor has the burden of proving the statute of limitations for the acquisition of real estate. The issue of whether the possessor is the owner's independent possession or the owner has no intention to own it should be determined by the internal deliberation of the possessor, not by the internal deliberation of the possessor, but by all circumstances related to the nature or possession of the title that caused the acquisition of real estate, on the basis of the title that the possessor is deemed to have no intention to own as a whole, or by the fact that the possessor has obtained possession based on the title that the possessor has no intention to own, or by removing the ownership of another person, exclusive ownership, such as his/her own property.