Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Criminal history (Defendant A) Defendant is the main owner of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building and the “D” located on the third floor.

The defendant from February 20, 2014 to the same year.

3. From June 23:00 to the above place of business, the said place of business made an advertisement (F) on the Internet site, such as “E,” and reported it to the said place of business, and received KRW 80,000 from the female employees, G from which he/she received KRW 50,000,000 from the female employees and allowed G to teach the said customer with a single sexual intercourse, thereby engaging in commercial sex acts against the said female customers, such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant A;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the police officers in H and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of controlled sexual traffic establishments;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation, etc. of Selective Commercial Sex Acts, concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Etc.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) of the Provisional Payment Order

1. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant, as indicated in the facts constituting the offense described in paragraph (1) of A, committed an act of arranging and arranging sexual traffic at a marina business establishment as indicated in the facts constituting the offense in the judgment of the Defendant, even though he was aware that A had been engaged in the act of arranging and arranging sexual traffic at the above place around February 20, 2014, he, even though he was aware that A had to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic, made a sublet up to KRW 10 million in deposit and KRW 5 million in monthly rent to A.

2. The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that he had a marina store operated in a place indicated in the facts of the crime (hereinafter “the instant place of business”) as indicated in the judgment by lending I the name of the Defendant and his defense counsel, but did not know that I operated the instant place of business, and only after regulating the police, I became aware that I had engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic at the instant place of business. After that, I had the instant place of business operated the head office.

Since a sublease contract was concluded with Defendant A, aiding and abetting sexual traffic;

shall be deemed to be.