Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the Bank of BankruptcyB.

At around 12:00 on 18:18. 12:00, the Defendant entered the 3rd Ekicaf of the building D in Chungcheongnam-si, which was awarded a successful bid by auction, and the Defendant demanded the victim F, who is an employee of the above kicaf, to leave the above kicaf by auction, despite the demand that the victim F, who is an employee of the above kicaf, should withdraw from the auction.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

Although the facts charged in the indictment are stated that the defendant and C jointly do not comply with the eviction, it is reasonable to see that the defendant and C are prosecuted respectively in consideration of the name of the crime and applicable provisions of the indictment, guarantee of the defendant's right to defense, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and G;

1. Relevant Article 319 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order are as follows: (a) the defendant erred in sentencing; (b) there are some circumstances to take into account the circumstances and motive of the case; (c) the representative C’s entry into the KIKO; and (d) time is relatively short; and (c) the victim and the victim agreed to do so is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that there are many criminal convictions, including the defendant's punishment, are disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the age, character and conduct, career, environment, background and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime was committed, and all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case.