A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On December 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to five years of imprisonment with prison labor for special robbery, etc. at the Incheon District Court’s Branch Branch of Incheon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the first intersection of North Korea on September 9, 2017. On May 9, 2018, the Defendant was appealed from a fine of KRW 10 million due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Jeju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Jeju Branch Branch of Jeju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Jeju District Court’s Jeju Branch of Jeju District Court’s Jeju Branch of District Court

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On June 17, 2018, the Defendant driven Systa car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.174% in blood from the street in front of P, in the city of nuclear power around 04:18 to the front of Q apartment R in the same city of Q apartment from the street in the city of nuclear power around 04:18.

B. On June 21, 2018, the Defendant driven Systa car under the influence of alcohol of 0.060% during blood while under the influence of alcohol, from the front of the nuclear power plant Q apartment R on June 21, 2018 to the vicinity of the legal research distance located in the same city-based city-based 61.

2. A person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) is a person engaged in the duties of driving S

On June 21, 2018, the Defendant driven the rocketing car at around 03:47, and proceeded with the legal survey distance in the 61st century from the view distance room to the view apartment.

Since there is an intersection where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, the defendant, who is engaged in driving duty, had a duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle that first entered the intersection, and then safely proceed to the accident according to the new code and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and proceeded with the red signal in violation of the signal in drinking condition, and due to the negligence of the defendant's failure, the passenger car of the victim V (62 tax) driven by U elementary school is WM5.