logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.02.02 2016가단106384
건물등철거
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) is one of 124 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnambuk-gun; (b)

(a)Attachment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.

Reasons

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. Facts of recognition 1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s land of this case, hereinafter “the instant land”).

2) Of the instant land, part of a toilet owned by the Defendant is located on the ground of one square meter in which part of the building owned by the Defendant was connected in order to each point of the attached Table 2, 3, 4, and 2, and each point of the attached Table 12, 13, 14, 15, and 12, and each part of a toilet owned by the Defendant is located on the ground of one square meter in the same appraisal level. The Defendant occupies the same appraisal level as indicated 1,2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 12.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 4 (including each number), the result of this court's commission of surveying and appraisal to the chief of the Korea Land Information Corporation, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of determination, the Defendant: (a) removed each of the toilets on the ground of “B” in the instant land, which are located on the ground of one square meter connected in order to the Plaintiff who exercises the right to claim the exclusion of interference based on ownership; and (b) removed each of the above land from each of the toilets on the ground of “B” in the attached Table No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 12; and (c) the same appraisal is also indicated 2, 3, 4, and 2; and (d) the same appraisal is also indicated 12, 13, 14, 15, and 12.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow