The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the representative director B of the corporation.

No person shall infringe any copyright by reproducing another person’s program copyright without legitimate authority.

Nevertheless, on January 17, 2011, the Defendant reproduced the computer program called 'Aut CAD 2009', which the victim holds copyright at the office of 505 of the building C, from January 17, 201, without the permission of the victim, and infringed on the victim's copyright by installing and using it on the computer, and installing it on the computer from January 17, 2011, and using it on the computer.

2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 136 (1) of the Copyright Act, which are subject to prosecution under the main sentence of Article 140 of the same Act. According to the letter of cancellation of complaint filed in the records, the victims can recognize the facts that the defendant revoked the complaint after the prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (5) of the