logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (전주) 2018.07.09 2017누1792
폐기물처리사업계획서 부적정처분 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the disposition are as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases where the two pages Nos. 2, 4, and 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. Thus, the judgment of the court of first instance shall be quoted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article

A. On September 22, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) on September 22, 2016, the Defendant: (b) 829-1 and 4,104 square meters of the Round-ri, Round-ri, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; (c)

3) On the ground, waste general recycling business that produces secondary soil by mixing the organic sludge, which is a general waste of the workplace, with secondary materials, such as fire fighting fire fighting units and secondary soil, etc. (hereinafter “instant business”).

) The plan for waste treatment business was submitted to the effect that it will operate.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The reasoning for the court’s argument concerning this part is as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except that the court shall accept the judgment of the first instance in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the ground that the Plaintiff’s argument is based on the ground that the “entry

B. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the relevant statutes is as stated in this part, except for the case where the “Waste Management Act” in Part 13 is deemed to be “Waste Control Act” among the judgment of the first instance. Therefore, the court of first instance shall accept the judgment pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

C. The court’s explanation on this part of the grounds for the violation of the duty to present the grounds for disposition is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus citing the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420

Examining the structure or language of the laws related to the permission of the 1st waste disposal business, these provisions provide the minimum requirements for obtaining a license for the waste disposal business, but they are appropriate for the business plan.

arrow