logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2020.11.25 2016가단66058
손해배상(산)
Text

1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 106,416,788, and KRW 5,00,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from November 29, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) Parties E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”)

(2) On January 11, 2003, the Plaintiff Company received from the Defendant Company a supply of human resources by receiving assistive materials, such as diskettes, from the Defendant Company, and the Plaintiff Company entered the non-party company and worked for the non-party company around January 11, 2003. The Plaintiff Company B was the legal spouse of the Plaintiff A (hereinafter “D before the division”) before the division (hereinafter “the Plaintiff Company”) was established for shipbuilding and repair sales, etc., and was established for the purpose of shipbuilding, special shipbuilding, offshore plant, and engine machinery business in which the instant lawsuit is pending, and established the Defendant in division, and the Defendant succeeded to the status of D before the division by succeeding to the rights and obligations of the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter referred to as “Defendant” without distinguishing between D Co., Ltd. and the Defendant before the division.

The instant accident occurred 1) The Defendant’s employees, as safety personnel belonging to the Shipbuilding Safety Department, was supplemented by the Handbath from G block in the Defendant Company on November 29, 2013, around 08:50 on November 29, 2013, for the purpose of the fall prevention of the satisfaction (land, 1,12m in length, about 4.1k in weight, hereinafter “Scath”).

(B) At the time of the lower fall from the hand to the lower end, the part of the Plaintiff A, who was going to the lower part of the work site of F and was faced with the part of the lower part of the work site of F for the convenience of workers (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

2) The Defendant Company limited the scope of the upper part of the block and the lower part of the block at the time of the instant accident. The Defendant Company did not have any safety net, working stand, etc. to prevent the fall of the Plaintiff’s buildings and things around the instant accident.

C. On December 27, 2013, Plaintiff A’s diagnosis and the process of relevant administrative litigation and Plaintiff A’s occurrence of the instant accident at H Hospital.

arrow